We do not allow any commercial promotion or solicitation. Please refer to the Reddit 9:1 rule when considering posting self promoting materials. Read and follow reddiquette no excessive self-promotion. Check out /r/ProgrammerHumor/ for this type of content. Specific issues that follow rule 6 are allowed.ĭo not post memes, screenshots of bad design, or jokes. For vague product support questions, please use communities relevant to that product for best results. No vague product support questions (like "why is this plugin not working" or "how do I set up X"). Beginner question? Try the FAQ first! or the WebDev Resources Post then post in the Beginner Questions thread.If you're trying Gateway, definitely use the EAP.Ī final note something someone said reminded me of: remember that with Gateway your IDE (probably) isn't running on the same host as your browser, so you may need to configure the remote_host in xdebug so that your browser knows where to connect to your debugger.Give it a spin, but for now I'd take pretty much any traditional local setup over Gateway/Projector. It generally lacks polish and isn't ready for prime time.Similar to above, various aspects of the UI, configuration and experience are just different than using the normal IDE locally.Some functions of IDE (or at least PhpStorm) aren't available in the Gateway "wrapper" (that might be the wrong word), and require switching over to the actual IDE window in the host, which is painfully slow/buggy.
Oddly enough, right-clicking on files is snappy. Certain UI behaviors are painfully slow, such as right-clicking on a directory (context menu takes ~6s to appear).The connection is stable and overall responsiveness is very good, particularly compared to Projector. I've been using Gateway to work on a remote (LAN) development environment for a few months now. I'm going to be looking into setting up a full blown Linux desktop instead, maybe using x2go - but that's for tomorrowĪnyone actually got a success story with it? However it seems we still have quite a way to go before that's a reality. I'd really love it if this system was a way to get a full blown PHPStorm running in the cloud and accessible via a thin client. connecting from a remote mac - unknown issues just causing it to hang and nothing in the logs indicating what might be going wrong.running commands - ssh agent forwarding did not seem to work well, but without it things seem OK.plugins - you probably have some that are basically required, though actually getting these installed and working seems flakey at best.Unfortunately it failed, though not where I thought it would. I had a bash at getting a remote development system working for someone
0 kommentar(er)
